LAMB Devours the Oscars

I'm not planning on weighing in on the Oscars.  I've seen a grand total of four of the ten best picture nominees and am not terribly interested in a couple of the choices.

Fortunately, there is another option for readers like me.  The Large Association of Movie Blogs is holding a blogging marathon called LAMB Devours the Oscars.  Each day for 31 days, they will feature a new post related to this year's Oscar awards.

  Love seeing Roger Deakins get some love!  You should check it out.

The Paleface (1922)

Buster tied to a pole... sort of...

Directed by Buster Keaton
Starring Buster Keaton, Virginia Fox and Joe Roberts
Produced by Buster Keaton Productions

In a rural part of America, a tribe of Indians lives in peace and harmony on their land.  Their tranquility is shattered when a group of oil barons steals the dead to their land.  The furious chief orders the death of the first white man to walk through their gate as retribution.

In walks Buster Keaton chasing a butterfly.

The tribe begins following Keaton around as he explores the insects on their land.  He eventually catches on that they mean him harm and he tries unsuccessfully to escape.  They tie Keaton to a pole, but he pulls the pole from the ground and changes positions as they attempt to build a fire around him.

He eventually does get away, finds and abandoned cabin and constructs some fire proof underwear from some asbestos fabrics.  Now when he is captured, he miraculously survives the burning and the tribe deifies him.

Can Buster help his adopted family get their land back?  And what will a competing tribe have to say about these developments?

As with other Keaton shorts, the plot of The Paleface is ancillary.  It's an excuse for Buster to pull off some great action-comedy set pieces.  The best of these is the bit with the pole described above.  Each time one of the Indians piles wood underneath Keaton's feet, Buster moves to a new spot when the Indian's back is turned.  The execution between the players is perfect for the gag.

Once Buster is accepted into the tribe, he leads the warriors to the office of the oil company and they threaten the businessman with a tribal dance.  Keaton interrupts the dance to critique one of the dancer's moves.  When one of the oil barons attempts to escape, Buster follows and returns with a toupee in hand.  The chief is impressed with the paleface's scalping abilities.

I watched this one with my eight-year-old and he loved it.  The sight gags and pratfalls hit him right in the funny bone every time.

The Paleface is another Keaton short and that is its greatest strength and primary weakness.  It's funny and contains some inventive gags, but it is cut from the same cloth as the comic's previous work.

*** out of *****

Beyond the Rocks (1922)

Valentino and Swanson

Directed by Sam Wood
Starring Gloria Swanson, Rudolph Valentino, Robert Bolder
Produced by Famous Players-Lasky Corporation

Poor Theodora.  What's a girl to do?

The youngest of three daughters born to a widower, she's the family's meal ticket if she can find a wealthy man to marry.  She's out in a boat one day and falls into the water, only to be rescued by the dashing Earl of Bracondale Hector.  He brings her onto the beach and she thanks him with a Narcissus flower (robbed of its scent by the water).

Theodora eventually receives her marriage proposal, but it's from Josiah Brown, an older, rotund grocer-turned millionaire who is seemingly looking for the trophy wife.  His money will help save her family so she says yes.

Theodora is now walking in the circles of the upper crust.  On their honeymoon in the Alps, a tired Josiah begs off hiking up a mountain, so Theodora goes out with a friend and a guide, but ends up falling off a cliff.  As she dangles precariously in the air, Hector fortuitously comes to her rescue.

Hector is now smitten.  Theodora is falling in love with the young aristocrat.  Will Theodora cast her family obligation aside and go off with Hector?  Or will she stay with a man she does not love out of a sense of duty?  And just what does Josiah think?

I am really surprised how much I liked this one.  Romance is not normally my thing, but the story here is almost constantly engaging and it moves along at a good clip (with one misstep; more on that to come).

The casting here is spot-on.  Gloria Swanson plays Theodora with beauty and elegance, but also a dangerous streak.  It's easy to see why when men fall for her, they fall hard.

And Rudolph Valentino: I now totally understand the mystique.  He underplays Hector in the movie.  He's a lazy, carefree playboy, but will totally change his ways for the right woman.  Theodora is that woman.  And she's taken.  You believe he is smitten with her, but he is also willing to step aside if she chooses to stay in her marriage.

Which bring me to the element that elevates this above most traditional romances: Josiah.  The romantic drama playbook is pretty absolute in its conventions.  If it's a choice between two guys, one must be a jerk.  It makes the woman's choice clear: stay with the guy undeserving of love or move to the one you belong with.  Beyond the Rocks does not make that easy choice.

Josiah is a nice guy.  He genuinely cares about Theodora and when he realizes she loves Hector, he's crushed.  He's so hurt, he undertakes a dangerous trip to north Africa, in the hopes that the dangerous terrain may end his life.  He starts out as this cardboard character that you expect to loathe.  By the end of the movie, he's a tragic hero who is the source of any emotion the audience feels.

The movie follows the travels of jet-setting aristocrats and the production design is spot on.  Every garden is impeccably manicured, every grand hall appropriately lavish.  The film gives its beautiful cast a series of gorgeous backdrops.

The only real problem for me in the movie is a sequence in which Hector tells Theodora the story of two lovers from the past and the film then shows us the story with Swanson and Valentino playing the parts.  The film grinds to a halt during the sequence.  It's unnecessary and overlong.

Beyond the Rocks is a movie I want to revisit with my wife.  It's a slight tale elevated by its actors and by some unconventional storytelling choices.  Definitely worth checking out.

****1/2 out of *****
Photo from GoneMovie.com

NOTE: Beyond the Rocks was thought to be a lost movie until a print was discovered in 2003.  That's right.  Barely seven years ago, people could not see this one.  It makes me sad to think of all the amazing cinema that has been lost to time.  It makes me hopeful to think there are still treasures waiting to be discovered in someone's attic.

1922: Now Brought to You in 3-D!

After an extended stay in 1921, we are moving on to 1922 (naturally).  Former President Taft dedicated the Lincoln Memorial, the site of numerous movie scenes (notably for me, Clint Eastwood's quiet moments from In the Line of Fire).  The Irish Free State forms with the Big Fella at its head.  And archaeologists entered King Tut's tomb.

In the movie world, The Power of Love was the first 3-D film ever made (complete with red and green glasses).  Russian filmmakers begin experimenting with montages (my hometown hero Rocky is forever in your debt).  And a couple of significant franchises are born: Rin-Tin-Tin and Our Gang (though no Alfalfa or Spanky yet).

The biggest news happened off-screen as Hollywood, nervous about compulsory censorship, creates the Motion Picture Producers and Distributors of America to manage its content.  By 1930, the organization's Hays Code would become the driving force behind movie censorship for decades.  Ultimately, the organization became the Motion Picture Association of America which continues to make baffling ratings decisions today.

So, what are we watching?  Honestly, I am not planning on staying here long.  I am very excited to do my first revisiting of a movie I saw before: Nosferatu.  It's been about 15 years since I watched it on video.  Besides that, Douglas Fairbanks' Robin Hood, Beyond the Rocks with Rudolph Valentino, and Oliver Twist (Lon Chaney!) are on my list. 

Photo from Wired

The Three Musketeers (1921)

Fairbanks takes the high ground

Directed by Fred Niblo
Starring Douglas Fairbanks, Léon Bary and George Siegmann
Produced by Douglas Fairbanks Pictures

Young, ambitious D'Artagnan sets off from his small town for Paris to fulfill his lifelong dream: to join the King's musketeers.  Along the way, he runs afoul of Rochefort, the right hand man of the evil Cardinal Richelieu.  D'Artagnan meets musketeers Athos, Porthos and Aramis, challenging them each to a duel, but the fight becomes a battle between the four men and the cardinal's guards.

Meanwhile, Richelieu is plotting against King Louis XIII.  His plan?  To retrieve a diamond buckle that the king gave to the queen, but that the queen gave to the English Duke she's in love with.  If Richelieu succeeds, he'll... um...errr....

Okay, the plot of this movie makes zero sense.  The king gives the queen a diamond jewel, making a point to say that it is one-of-a-kind.  Impossible to reproduce.  The queen immediately turns around and gives it to the duke.  The cardinal witnesses this and, rather than accuse her on the spot, convinces the king to ask the queen to wear the bling to a ball a few days later. So, we get a lots of scenes of the queen wringing her hands and the Cardinal looking very self-satisfied.  It also means our hero can race to England to try and retreive the bauble. 

It's easy to dismiss the story as a meaningless excuse for Fairbanks to be let loose his manic energy, but the film spends a lot of time on the plot.  There are a lot of scenes that exist to communicate the gravity and stakes of the situation.  We see lots of symbolic chess games.  We get lots of characters making bold pledges with massive flourishes of the arms. We get a lot of our villain and our damsel in distress pondering their plans and fates.  We try to build tension as the cardinal's men assemble for the climax while D'Artagnan races toward the city.  So, the story matters and it is nonsensical. 

As for Fairbanks, he is fine here.  Not great, but not bad.  He shines when there are action scenes, but there aren't enough chases and battles in this movie to distract from his poor acting in the other scenes.  He spends much of the movie with this completely earnest look on his face that is just painful to watch.  To say nothing of the fact that he is way too old to play this part.  He looks the same age as the other musketeers, if not older.  That would be fine if they adapted the story to service his age, but they make a point of him being a younger man several times.

The movie works during its inventive action scenes.  I like the swordfight early on between the musketeers and the cardinal's guards.  D'Artagnan's one-on-dozens battle and subsequent escape over Paris' rooftops is thrilling.  And the final fight between our hero and Rochefort feels like an epic precursor to Errol Flynn's The Adventures of Robin Hood climax.

The standout performance here for me was Nigel De Brulier's Cardinal Richelieu.  He never really does anything overtly bad, but one look at the guy and you know he's evil.  You can always see the wheels turning in his head and his eyes relish the moments when he thinks he has won.  I also love the Bond villain like secret door and staircase in his office.

The other notable achievement of the film is in the production design.  The king's halls feel grand.  Paris feels like a lived in place populated by real people, not extras.  The scenes of Fairbanks following a young woman he has just saved through the nighttime streets makes the alleys look menacing and foreboding.

One last thing: the ending for this is silly and not in a good, Fairbanks-y way.  The Richelieu from the previous 98 percent of the movie would never do what he does at the end.  the change in character is ridiculously jarring and sets up a "hey, everything worked out" ending that is really unearned.

At the end of the day, The Three Musketeers is a movie that wants to have it both ways.  It wants to be a zany, comic action-adventure. It also wants to be a palace intrigue thriller.  It accomplishes neither.  It's overstuffed with story and characters and isn't as filled with the Fairbanks brand of boundless energy as his previous work.  And that's a disappointment as I loved Fairbanks' take on Zorro.

**1/2 out of *****

Photo from DVDTalk

Shameless Self-Promotion: The Kid and Other Things

I want to give some love to the LAMB blog for featuring the 100 Years' review of Charlie Chaplin's The Kid!  I also want to make sure people check out Chris Edwards' look at Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm, originally reviewed here.

Leaves from Satan's Book (1921)

Jesus, the apostles and a lot of text

Directed by Carl Theodor Dreyer
Starring Helge Nissen (and a lot of other people)
Produced by Nordisk Film

The war in heaven is over and Satan has lost.  As his punishment, Satan is sentenced to tempt humans into evil actions.  If people give into temptation, Satan receives another 100 years of punishment.  However, if they can resist, God will remove 1000 years from Satan's sentence.

Leaves from Satan's Book follows the devil as he attempts to sow the seeds of evil at the time of the Crucifixion, the Inquisition, the French Revolution and the Finnish Civil War.  There is one good movie here, two okay ones and one that is terrible.

The best of the four is the tale during the French Revolution.  As the aristocrats are rounded up, Joseph. a servant of the Count de Chambord, sneaks his master's wife and daughter into Paris to avoid the guillotine.  Joseph is in love with the daughter, but she does not reciprocate his feelings.  Satan, in the form of Erneste, brings Joseph into the Jacobin circle.  Erneste points out to Joseph that he only needs to threaten to expose the lineage of the de Chambords.  Joseph resists, but Satan forges a letter to the Jacobins about the aristocrats and blames it on Joseph.  If the man admits he did not author the letter, he will be led to the guillotine.  If he lies and says he exposed the women, he will be hated forever by the woman he loves.  What will he do?

The two okay movies follow similar paths, albeit with different endings.  The Inquisition episode revolves around a priest that lusts after a woman.  He can use his position to pressure the woman.  In the Finnish story, a man in love with a Finnish patriot's wife threatens to inform on the couple to the Red army.  These two are pretty simple tales told well by the director.

The same cannot be said of the Bible story.  It's poorly acted, poorly edited and has no tension at all.  There are random cuts to close-ups of people's faces that are inexplicable.  The film never shows us during this episode, it tells us.  Almost nothing is conveyed by the camera; it's all done through title cards.  Satan's influence over the high priests makes no sense because they are already screaming for blood.  And there's nothing like building dramatic tension by telling a story that everyone knows and bringing nothing different to it.

There's a flotilla of actors here and none are extraordinary.  Helge Nissen's Satan connects the tales and you never feel the internal conflict he must have being cursed to entreat people into actions that lengthen his own punishment.

I can't really recommend anyone sit through this.  The opening tale is the Passion and it is horrendous.  The other three are okay, but nothing special.

** out of *****

Photo from Greencine Daily

Tol'able David (1921)

David and Rocket in a quiet moment

Directed by Henry King
Starring Richard Barthelmess, Gladys Hulette, Walter P. Lewis
Produced by Inspiration Pictures

Over the mountains in a valley, you'll find a sleepy 'burg called Greenstream where the Kinemon clan herd cattle and live a peaceful existence.  The oldest son Allen delivers the mail and takes passengers around the valley as he dotes on his expectant wife Rose.  The youngest son David plays with his trusty dog Rocket, swims in the stream by their house and dreams of the day he'll take over Allen's job as the mail carrier.  He is also in love with the girl next door (though he does not even know that yet).

Into their idyllic existence come the Hatburns, a family of thugs on the lam.  When the three villains are run out of a neighboring state, they come to their cousin's house in Greenstream.  One day, as Allen is making his deliveries with Rocket, the dog chases a cat onto the Hatburn property.  One of the Hatburns grabs a board and strikes the dog dead.  Allen confronts the clan, but they throw a rock at his head, crippling him for life.

David's father collects his weapon to seek vengeance upon the Hatburns, but David argues with the man and his father falls dead, the victim of a heart attack. Now, David has a choice: does he seek revenge upon the Hatburns himself? Or does he put aside his anger to take care of his family?


Of all the films I've watched so far, this may be my greatest find.  I'm sure others more knowledgeable about film have this on their radar, but I had never heard of it.  I knew of Henry King though and have been impressed by Bartelmess' work thus far.

This is one of my favorites of the marathon to date.

Film is a visual medium and King gets that.  You could pause the movie on almost any frame and hang it on your wall.  King gets shot composition.  He takes complete advantage of his setting.  The town looks like a place we'd all want to live.  The creek near the Kinemon homestead is so picturesque, you wish you had a swimming hole of your own.

The imagery is all in service to a great story. In lesser hands, it could be melodramatic in a bad way, but in King's hands, it uses every episode to build to the climax.  After the attack on Allen it takes a breath, but only a breath, before continuing to tell its story.  When the Kinemons lose their home, you feel the loss because the film takes the time to make you fall in love with their way of life.  By the time you reach the film's climax, every moment feels earned.  Really first-rate film making.

Of course, the entire film hinges on Barthelmess' performance and he does not disappoint.  You believe him as a boy, you believe him in his rage and you you believe him as he begrudgingly is forced into manhood.  His David has moments of childlike mischievousness, anger at his family's fate and pride in fulfilling his obligations to his family and Barthelmess rises to every challenge.

Now that my friends is a villain!

The rest of the cast is fantastic.  David's mother (played by Marion Abbott) has a heart-breaking scene where she begs David not to seek retribution.  The rest of the Kinemon and Hatburn families are well acted, but Ernest Torrance as the most despicable of the villains is creepier than just about any bad guy I have ever seen.  He simply enjoys violence.

What I will remember most from Tol'able David are the quiet moments.  David imagining himself as the mail carrier while sitting on a fence post.  His leap into the water followed by him spitting a geyser into the air.  The exchange between David's parents as the father loads his rifle to seek justice.  David's joy when he finally gets to drive the mail cart.


There is one movie trope that I'd note because it's the first time I've seen it in an early film.  There's a scene when two of our characters engage in a fight.  At the end of the struggle, they both dive for a gun.  The film cuts away, but ultimately comes back to the front door of the home where the fight took place.  The door opens.  It is only when we see who emerges that we know who got to the gun first.  How many times have you seen that in a thriller (or its close relation: two characters struggling over the out-of-frame gun when it goes off, leaving those few seconds of uncertainty about who was shot).

I cannot recommend this one enough.  It brought me in from the first frame and kept my attention until the thrilling climax.  It's beautiful to watch, engaging to follow, with a lead performance for the ages.

***** out of *****

Photos from Mondo 70 and Awards Daily

A Different Take on Modern Times

For all of the Chaplin fans out there...





via One Cool Thing a Day

Out of the Inkwell: Modeling (1921)

Directed by Dave Fleischer
Starring Max Fleischer
Produced by Out of the Inkwell Films

In a small studio, two artists labor over their work.  On one side, an animator is attempting to put some energy into a drawing of KoKo the Clown.  On the other, a sculptor is attempting to placate a man unsatisfied with the clay model of his head.  Leave it to a very animated Koko to throw a monkeywrench into everyone's plans.

This is a fun short in the vein of the previous Out of the Inkwell short that melds real life with animation.  Here, Koko the Clown skates around a frozen pond on paper, dealing with a hole in the ice and a playful polar bear.  Once he tires of that, he starts creating his own versions of the man the animators are attempting to draw.  Eventually, the clown has enough of life on the page and begins causing chaos in the studio.

The real amazement here continues to be the wonderful animation by the Fleischer Brothers. There is a fluid movement to the creations that is mesmerizing to look at.  Having grown up on Superman, it is awesome to see the more playful side of Max Fleischer.

The tale here is slight and serves as an excuse to move Koko around the studio.  Still, a very good early effort from some amazing animators.

***1/2 out of *****

Photo from Wild Realm Reviews

Orphans of the Storm (1921)

The guillotine awaits our heroine

Directed by D.W. Griffith

Starring Lillian Gish, Dorothy Gish, Joseph Schildkraut
Produced by D.W. Griffith Productions

In 18th century France, a family is torn apart when the husband is killed and their baby abducted.  The men leave the child on the steps of Notre Dame Cathedral, where she is found by Jean Girard.  Girard is bringing his own baby daughter to abandon.  However, upon seeing the baby lying in the snow, he returns home with both his own child Henriette and the found one Louise.  The Girards rais the girls as sisters, until the plague arrives, killing the parents and leaving Louise blind.

Henriette finds a doctor in Paris who can cure Louise, but the blind woman wants her sister's assurance that she will not leave Louise for a husband in the city.  Henriette makes the promise and the two set off for the city.  Their path crosses an aristocrat who falls for Henriette and he kidnaps her, leaving the blind Louise to fall into the clutches of the Frochards, a family of beggars who see the stricken woman as a meal ticket. 

Henriette escapes from the nobleman with the help of Chevalier de Vaudrey and the two fall in love.  Of course, the beginning of the French Revolution may destroy everyone and everything.  Can Henriette find her sister in Paris?  And will she keep her promise not marry until Louise has regained her sight?  Or will the sisters be casualties of the revolution.

Orphans of the Storm is a good period piece by D.W. Griffith featuring real life sisters Lillian and Dorothy Gish.  I loved the last two-thirds of the movie.  From the moment the sisters are separated, the film sails on the acting skill of Dorothy and especially Lillian Gish.  As Lillian begs to be saved from her abducter, you feel her desperation.  You sense her internal conflict in every moment with de Vaudrey.

This is also a return to form (for the most part for Griffith).  The end sequence with Danton, a French revolutionary, racing to save Henriette from the guillotine is thrilling (though a mash-up of the climax of The Birth of a Nation and the modern story from Intolerance).  The aristocratic party and the battle scenes from the revolution are classic Griffith.  They are crisply paced, well-edited and  have a scale that you can only get from a movie.

The scale of the movie is also one of its great weaknesses.  The scope means you spend the first half hour meeting various characters and getting a lot of exposition.  Because some of the players have no interaction with the sisters until much later, it feels a bit plodding at times.  Once he sets the table however, the movie moves at a better pace.

There is one absolutlely brilliant shot that I want to highlight.  An aristocrat's carriage moves through a crowd of children who scatter.  One of the children doesn't move fast enough and is trampled by the horses and carriage.  The first time I watched it happen on screen took my breath away.  Amazing practical effects work for the time!

There are some odd choices throughout that hurt the tale.  Some of the edits are overly choppy, as though the director was watching to much MTV.  There's also a secondary character Picard who randomly turns into comic relief throughout the last third of the film, and always at the worst possible moment for comedy.  I know why Griffith is attempting to inject the laughs, but it just doesn't work.

Still, the direction and the acting are top notch and Griffith continues to pull out both surprising and effective camera moves and angles.  It's 2-1/2 hours long, so it's not going to be for everyone.  Orphans of the Storm is not as good as Intolerance, but it's closer to the Griffith I love than his last couple.

**** out of *****

Photo from The Dancing Image

Never Weaken (1921)

Lloyd in a precarious situation

Directed by Fred C. Newmeyer
Starring Harold Lloyd, Mildred Davis, Roy Brooks
Produced by Rolin Films

Harold is in love with the girl in the next office.  He dangles an engagement ring from a string out his office window for her to slip on her finger.  So when the girl's job in an osteopath's office is threatened due to a lack of business, Harold must step in to save his damsel in distress. 

He employs the gymnast in the office across the hall to fake some slip-and-fall accidents so Harold can "cure" the man and hand out cards.  It works too well until a policeman gets wise to the scheme.

A triumphant hero returns to his girl only to discover her in the arms of another man.  Dejected, Harold returns to his office and plots his suicide, but cannot follow through.  He rigs a gun to fire at his chest when his door opens and calls the janitor to come to his office.  The blindfolded Harold thinks he has been shot, but really a bulb has fallen on the floor.

As he sits there feeling his life slip away, a girder from the construction site next door slides into the office lifting Harold chair and all out the window.  Will Harold survive?  And can he win the girl back?  Does he even need to?

Okay, now I get Harold Lloyd.

His early stuff echoed a lot of the same themes as other, better comedians.  But here is something truly original.  The film is essentially three different scenarios.  The first, with Harold attempting to find patients for his girlfriend's boss, is relatively mundane.  The humor derives primarily from the gymnast's antics, though Harold gets a moment or two.  Still, nothing incredibly creative.

The second bit with Harold attempting suicide is a wonderful bit of black comedy.  He starts by trying to drink poison.  He writes his suicide note, then makes a correction.  Then checks the dictionary to make sure his spelling is correct.  A fly lands on his nose and he gets distracted by that.  He smells the potion and decides it needs more sugar.  Ultimately, he knocks the glass over.  He also attempts to stab, electrocute and shoot himself.  He chickens out on each attempt.  Dark stuff for a comedy, but I loved it.

The final third finds a blindfolded Harold awaiting the gunshot when a steel girder yanks him high into the air. He spends the next few minutes jumping from girder to girder and dodging hot rivets in an attempt to save himself.  The ending manages to be both thrilling and funny.

Lloyd's comedy features thrills and laughs in a perfect blend here.  The only piece I'd lose or shorten is the beginning.  You really didn't need him drumming up patients for the doctor to get to the true gold here.  This is the first of his shorts I've seen that I really liked.  I cannot wait to see what his move to features holds.

**** out of *****

Gertie in the Flesh

I'm visiting family in Florida and we went to Disney's Hollywood Studios.  So (of course) I had to snap a shot of Winsor McCay's remarkable creation Gertie the Dinosaur.  In Disney, she exists as an ice cream shop, but Disney Imagineers included her in the park's design to pay homage to a big influence on Walt Disney.

The Kid (1921)



A distraught Jacki Coogan



Directed by Charlie Chaplin

Starring Charlie Chaplin, Jackie Coogan, Edna Purviance

Produced by Charlie Chaplin Productions

A new mother is evicted from the charity hospital. Her crime? Having her child out of wedlock. In desperation she leaves her son in the backseat of a car outside of a mansion. Maybe this rich family can provide a better life for her boy.

Unfortunately, the car is almost immediately stolen by a couple of criminals. They discover the child and leave him in an alley where our beloved tramp comes upon him. He tries to ditch the kid, but when he finds a note saying the baby is an orphan, he decides to raise the child himself.

Fast forward five years. The woman has become a famous star, but she does charity work hoping to find her abandoned child. As for the boy, he is living with the tramp, executing scams to make money.

Will the woman find her son? And what will become of the tramp?

Incredible.

Every aspect of The Kid is head and shoulders above every other comedy I have seen so far. A fantastic mix of comedy and drama that manages to make you laugh moments before yanking your heartstrings.

Jackie Coogan is remarkable as the title character.  His kid is wonderfully expressive and a terrific mimic of Chaplin.  But when he is abducted by the orphanage officials, his fear and terror are so palpable it kills you inside to watch. 

Chaplin is (of course) brilliant.  In many ways, he is underplaying his character compared to some of the other shorts he has done.  He's not as over-the-top zany as he has been.  The comedy is more grounded in reality which serves the story perfectly.

My favorite comedic moments?  I love the image of the baby in the makeshift hammock drinking from a coffee pot-turned-bottle.  I love Chaplin's con with the boy (the boy breaks windows, Chaplin comes along to repair them).  I love the fight between Chaplin and the kid and the bullies.  Sure, it's reminiscent of Easy Street, but the stakes here are higher.

What truly makes The Kid remarkable though is the moment when Charlie loses his ward.  The movie took the time to build their relationship through comedic and quiet moments and it pays off.  Charlie flips out and chases down the orphanage truck across the rooftops.  It's a spectacular sequence.

The film ends with an elaborate dream sequence where Chaplin's neighborhood is transformed into heaven.  All of its denizens except the Tramp now sport wings.  The kid is there and helps Charlie buy his own wings, but they seem to bug him.  Sin enters this world and ultimately Charlie falls for a woman he shouldn't.  He tries to get away, but the police shoot him out of the sky.  He awakens on the steps of his flat, being summoned by the police, not to be arrested, but to be reunited with his surrogate child and his mother.

The tramp has always been opposed to authority.  Here though, it seems the message is that the Tramp's love of the child can be something transformative.  The police who oppose him early on, ultimately deliver him and the audience to the happiest of endings.

***** out of *****

The Affairs of Anatol (1921)

Directed by Cecil B. DeMille

Starring Gloria Swanson, Wallace Reid, Wanda Hawley

Produced by Famous Players-Lasky Corporation

Anatol and Vivian are newlyweds with a problem: Anatol enjoys helping other women. Why is that a problem?  Because he ignores everything else in his life to help his charity cases.  Everything, including his wife.

When he meets a high school sweetheart who is selling herself for money, he has to save her. He cannot help it. Vivian is driven nuts by her husband and wants him to focus on his home life. She is even willing to relocate to the country to help remove the temptation.

Can Antol change his focus back to his wife? Or will he realize the error of his ways too late?

The Affairs of Antol has a pretty straightforward setup. Young husband focuses his attention on another woman. Wife gets frustrated with husband. Husband is exasperated that wife doesn't understand his desire to help a friend. Frankly, for much of the first act, I was bored.

Then, Antol loses it.

NOTE: A lot of spoilers follow, as I cannot really explain why I like this one without outlining the craziness of the scenarios. 

Anatol's childhood friend initially wants to begin a new life.  She tries to learn the violin and give up her jewels.  Ultimately, she can't change her ways and goes back to her sugar daddy and the partying lifestyle Antol is trying to save her from. So, Anton DESTROYS her apartment. I mean the guy breaks everything up to and including a grand piano. He goes insane.

From then on, the movie is full-on crazy. Vivian throws a party with a hypnotist who convinces her to start undressing in front of a room full of people (including her husband). There are some great visuals as we see the stream Vivian imagines she is crossing (hence the undressing) flowing through the room.  Anatol is mortified.

They move to the country and take a boat out on the river at exactly the moment another desperate woman who is attempting to drown herself because she stole from a local charity.  Not only does Anatol save her, but as Vivian goes for help, the man makes out with the woman.

The couple separates.  Anatol tries hanging at the night club, but discovers he needs his wife Vivian.  She returns from a night on the town with a mutual friend.  He demands to know what happened between the two of them, but Vivian isn't spilling.

In one final moment of desperation, Anatol has Vivian hypnotized.  She must answer one question asked by her husband truthfully before awakening.  Great little drama at the end.

The leads here are great in their roles and the direction is perfect without being showy.  The characters and scenarios presented are fantastical, but I was riveted.  It's a 90 year old movie and I had no idea where it was going next.  It almost reminded me of a Coen Brothers film.  The Affairs of Anatol is not for everyone, but its dark humor and extreme situations were enough to keep me engaged.
**** out of *****